University of Leicester
Browse

Developing a Core Outcome Set for hospital deprescribing trials for older people under the care of a geriatrician

Download (1.06 MB)
Version 2 2023-06-23, 15:43
Version 1 2022-08-09, 13:13
journal contribution
posted on 2023-06-23, 15:43 authored by Jackie Martin-Kerry, Jo Taylor, Sion Scott, Martyn Patel, David Wright, Allan Clark, David Turner, David Phillip Alldred, Katherine Murphy, Victoria Keevil, Miles D. Witham, Ian Kellar, Debi Bhattacharya

Background: Half of older people are prescribed unnecessary/inappropriate medications that are not routinely deprescribed in hospital hence there is a need for deprescribing trials. We aimed to develop a Core Outcome Set (COS) for deprescribing trials for older people under the care of a geriatrician during hospital admission.Methods: We developed a list of potentially relevant outcomes from the literature. Using a two-round Delphi survey of stakeholder groups representing older people and carers, hospital clinicians, hospital managers, and ageing/deprescribing researchers, each outcome was scored according to Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, followed by two consensus workshops to finalise the COS.Results: Two hundred people completed Round 1 and 114 completed Round 2. Representing all stakeholder groups, 10 people participated in workshop 1 and 10 in workshop 2. Six outcomes were identified as most important, feasible and acceptable to collect in a trial: number of prescribed medicines stopped; number of prescribed medicines with dosage reduced; quality of life; mortality; adverse drug events and number of hospital stays. Three other outcomes were identified as important, but currently too burdensome to collect: number of potentially inappropriate medicines prescribed; burden from medicationroutine; and medication-related admissions to hospital.Conclusions: A COS represents the minimum outcomes that should be collected and reported. Whilst uncommon practice for COS development, the value of considering outcome collection feasibility is demonstrated by the removal of three potential outcomes that, if included may have compromised COS uptake due to challenges with collecting the data.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research stream (award ID PGfAR 200874

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration East of England (NIHR ARC EoE) at Cambridge and Peterborough NHS Foundation Trus

History

Author affiliation

School of Allied Health Professions, University of Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Age and Ageing

Volume

51

Issue

11

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

issn

0002-0729

Acceptance date

2022-07-12

Copyright date

2022

Available date

2023-06-23

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC