University of Leicester
Browse

Dietary intervention in gestational diabetes: a qualitative study of the acceptability and feasibility of a novel whole-diet intervention in healthcare professionals

Download (732.91 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-07-04, 13:48 authored by Laura Caroline Kusinski, Rebecca Richards, Danielle L Jones, Elizabeth Turner, Deborah J Hughes, Pamela Dyson, Amy L Ahern, Claire Louise Meek

Gestational diabetes is treated with medical nutrition therapy, delivered by healthcare professionals; however, the optimal diet for affected women is unknown. Randomised controlled trials, such as the DiGest (Dietary Intervention in Gestational Diabetes) trial, will address this knowledge gap, but the acceptability of whole-diet interventions in pregnancy is unclear. Whole-diet approaches reduce bias but require high levels of participant commitment and long intervention periods to generate meaningful clinical outcomes. We aimed to assess healthcare professionals’ views on the acceptability of the DiGest dietbox intervention for women with gestational diabetes and to identify any barriers to adherence which could be addressed to support good recruitment and retention to the DiGest trial. Female healthcare professionals (n 16) were randomly allocated to receive a DiGest dietbox containing 1200 or 2000 kcal/d including at least one weeks’ food. A semi-structured interview was conducted to explore participants’ experience of the intervention. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically using NVivo software. Based on the findings of qualitative interviews, modifications were made to the dietboxes. Participants found the dietboxes convenient and enjoyed the variety and taste of the meals. Factors which facilitated adherence included participants having a good understanding of study aims and sufficient organisational skills to facilitate weekly meal planning in advance. Barriers to adherence included peer pressure during social occasions and feelings of deprivation or hunger (affecting both standard and reduced calorie groups). Healthcare professionals considered random allocation to a whole-diet replacement intervention to be acceptable and feasible in a clinical environment and offered benefits to participants including convenience.

Funding

Chewing the fat: gestational weight gain, gestational diabetes and pregnancy outcomes, a multi-site, randomised, controlled interventional study

Diabetes UK

Find out more...

ISRCTN65152174

Novo Nordisk Foundation Future Leaders’ Award (NNF19SA058974)

Medical Research Council (MC UU 00006/6)

History

Citation

ritish Journal of Nutrition. 2024;131(2):219-228

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Population Health Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

British Journal of Nutrition

Volume

131

Issue

2

Pagination

219 - 228

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

issn

0007-1145

eissn

1475-2662

Acceptance date

2023-07-21

Copyright date

2023

Available date

2024-07-04

Spatial coverage

England

Language

en

Deposited by

Professor Claire Meek

Deposit date

2024-07-03

Rights Retention Statement

  • No

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC