University of Leicester
Browse

Dimensions and location of high-involvement management: fresh evidence from the UK Commission's 2011 Employer Skills Survey

Download (200.4 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-01-27, 12:44 authored by Stephen J. Wood, S. Nolte, Mark Burridge, Daniela Rudloff, William Green
High-involvement management is typically seen as having three components: worker involvement, skill and knowledge acquisition and motivational supports. The prescriptive literature implies the elements should be used together; but using data from the UK Commission's Employer Skills Survey of 2011 we find that these dimensions of high-involvement management are in reality separate. Two types of involvement, role and organisational, are not strongly related, and motivational supports are not strongly correlated with other practices or each other. Size of workplace and the sector in which it operates are associated with the dimensions of high-involvement management. However, there is variety in their other predictors. For example, organisational involvement and skill acquisition are positively related to workplace size while role involvement is negatively associated with it. The research illustrates the value of scaling methods over blanket indexes to measure high involvement management and highlights the independent effects of quality and operational management methods.

History

Citation

Human Resource Management Journal, 2014, 25 (2), pp. 166-183

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/School of Management

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Human Resource Management Journal

Publisher

Wiley

issn

0954-5395

eissn

1748-8583

Copyright date

2014

Available date

2016-12-22

Publisher version

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1748-8583.12064/abstract

Notes

The file associated with this record is under a 24-month embargo from publication in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above. Erratum available at dx.doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12083

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC