University of Leicester
Browse
0038038520954318.pdf (183.46 kB)

Disciplinary Power and Impression Management in the Trials of the Stansted 15

Download (183.46 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-11-23, 10:24 authored by Steven Cammiss, Graeme Hayes, Brian Doherty
We bring Foucauldian and Goffmanian frameworks into dialogue to show how repressive and disciplinary power operate in the criminal trials of social movement activists. We do so through an ethnographic account of the trials on terrorism-related charges of a group of anti-deportation direct action protesters known as the Stansted 15, complemented by interviews with defendants. We argue that the prosecution of these activists on terrorism-related charges creates conditions of constraint which effectively serve to collapse the space for political and normative challenge, and obliges them to develop impression management strategies internalising and reproducing the court’s expressive regime. We see these trials therefore as a normalising procedure whose goal is not the repressive application of custodial sentences, but rather a disciplinary disarming of radical critique so that leniency can be applied. At stake here, therefore, is the production through trial of the ideal disciplined liberal political subject.

History

Author affiliation

School of Law

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Sociology

Publisher

SAGE Publications

issn

0038-0385

Acceptance date

2020-08-06

Copyright date

2020

Available date

2020-11-11

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC