posted on 2014-04-15, 12:59authored bySebastian Peyer
This article looks at the potential impact of the draft Directive on U.K. discovery in
antitrust cases and the lessons that have been learned in the U.K. courts so far. The focus will be
on the practice involving leniency and settlement documents in private litigation. The U.K.
experience may help to understand how discovery procedures could work in other jurisdictions
and it also shows that sensible judicial oversight can limit the costs associated with the disclosure
of evidence.
Section 2 briefly describes the disclosure regime in the United Kingdom and the likely
impact of the EU disclosure proposal. Section 3 looks at how the U.K. courts have solved the
specific problem of access to leniency submissions. Section 4 discusses the potential issues arising
from the limitations suggested in the draft Directive. Section 5 concludes.
History
Citation
Antitrust Chronicle, 2013 , 8 (1), pp. 1-8
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF ARTS, HUMANITIES AND LAW/School of Law