University of Leicester
Browse

Dissimilarity between discourse characters influences the processing of contrastive focus: An ERP study

journal contribution
posted on 2025-02-06, 10:47 authored by Yi Lin, Kevin PatersonKevin Paterson, Lijing Chen
The present study used event-related potentials to investigate effects of the similarity or dissimilarity of discourse referents on the processing of contrastive focus during Chinese reading. Participants first read a background story. They then were presented with a series of two-clause sentences using a RSVP paradigm. The first clause of each sentence included the names of two characters from the background story, who were either similar or dissimilar in terms of social category (which was specified in terms of age and gender). The second clause referred to one of these characters by name, using the Chinese focus particle “shi” to focus on this name or not. The results show that focused names elicit a larger P300 than non-focused names. Furthermore, discourse-final words elicited a larger P300 when the focused character was dissimilar rather than similar to the other character, with no effect in the non-focus condition. These findings replicate prior findings showing that the P300 is sensitive to the processing of contrastive focus during reading. The findings also show that the processing of contrastive focus is sensitive to similarity/dissimilarity between discourse referents, and that how this information is used may depend on the pragmatic implicatures associated with contrastive focus.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China [grant number 19CYY004].

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Psychology & Vision Sciences

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journal of Neurolinguistics

Volume

73

Pagination

101234 - 101234

Publisher

Elsevier BV

issn

0911-6044

eissn

1873-8052

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2025-11-28

Language

en

Deposited by

Professor Kevin Paterson

Deposit date

2025-01-31

Data Access Statement

The data for this paper are openly accessible at the OSF (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/TWEHQ).

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC