University of Leicester
Browse

Divided By a Common Concept? Assessing the Implications of Different Conceptualisations of Hate Crime in the European Union

Download (185.04 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2012-05-30, 10:41 authored by Jon Garland, Neil Chakraborti
In recent years the European Union (EU) has witnessed rising levels of hate crime. However, although there have been a number of legislative and other policy initiatives introduced across the EU to combat such offences, these have developed in a piecemeal and sometimes half-hearted fashion. This article outlines the difficulties evident in theorizing hate crime and how these problems have been reflected in the divergent ways that hate crime legislation has developed across the EU. It argues that an approach to combating hate crime based on human rights, which is endorsed by many EU institutions, has failed to tackle the problem effectively and has resulted in the uneven protection of hate crime victim groups. By utilizing an individual rather than a group-based human rights approach, the damaging nature and effect of such ‘targeted victimization’ upon all hate crime victims can be better understood and addressed.

History

Citation

European Journal of Criminology, 2012, 9 (1), pp. 38-51

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE/Department of Criminology

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

European Journal of Criminology

Publisher

Sage Publications

issn

1477-3708

eissn

1741-2609

Copyright date

2012

Available date

2013-02-01

Publisher version

http://euc.sagepub.com/content/9/1/38

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC