posted on 2018-02-12, 14:29authored byLouis S. Levene, Richard Baker, Nicola Walker, Christopher Williams, Andrew Wilson, John Bankart
Background
Increased relationship continuity in primary care is associated with better health outcomes,
greater patient satisfaction and fewer hospital admissions. Greater socio-economic
deprivation is associated with lower levels of continuity, as well as poorer health outcomes.
Aim
To investigate whether deprivation scores predicted variations in the decline over time of
patient-perceived relationship continuity of care, after adjustment for practice organisational
and population factors.
Design and Setting
Observational study. Longitudinal multilevel linear model for 2012-2017 inclusive; 6,243
practices in England with more than one GP.
Methods
Relationship continuity was calculated using two questions from the General Practice Patient
Survey. The effect of deprivation on the linear slope of continuity over time was modelled,
adjusting for nine confounding variables (practice population and organisational factors).
Clustering of measurements within general practices was adjusted for by modelling general
practice as a random effect, using a random intercepts and random slopes model. Descriptive
statistics and univariable analyses were also undertaken.
Results
Continuity declined by 27.5% between 2012 and 2017 and at all deprivation levels.
Deprivation scores from 2012 did not predict variations in the decline of relationship
continuity at practice level, after accounting for the effects of organisational and population
confounding variables, which themselves did not predict (smokers, permanent disability and
geographical location), or weakly predicted (Black or South Asian ethnicity, list size, over
75s, long-term conditions) with very small effect sizes, the decline of continuity. Crosssectionally,
continuity and deprivation were negatively correlated within each year.
Conclusion
Deprivation scores did not predict decline in relationship continuity over time, which is
persistent and widespread in English primary care.
History
Citation
British Journal of General Practice, 2018, 68 (671): e420-e426.
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences
The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.