posted on 2025-04-16, 15:23authored byDavid Wright, Jeanette Blacklock, Veronica Bion, Linda Birt, Allan Clark, Alys Wyn Griffiths, Cecile Guillard, Susan Stirling, Andy Jones, Richard Holland, Liz Jones, Thando Katangwe-Chigamba, Carys Seeley, Jennifer Pitcher, Helen Risebro, Sion ScottSion Scott, Adam Wagner, Erika Sims, Saiqa Ahmed, Luke Cook, Amrish Patel
Abstract
Background
Care home staff’s (CHS’s) influenza vaccination rate in England is 30%–40%, below the 75% WHO recommendation. We describe the effectiveness of a theory-informed and feasibility-tested intervention (in-home clinics; posters/videos to address vaccination hesitancy and care home financial incentives for uptake) to improve CHS vaccination rates.
Method
Recruited care homes in England with CHS vaccination rates <40% were randomised at the home level for intervention or control. Assuming a change in CHS vaccinated from 55% to 75%, 20% attrition, and 90% power, we required 39 homes per arm. Monthly data were collected throughout flu season. The difference in vaccination rates between the arms was compared using the intention-to-treat principle and a random effect logistic regression model.
Findings
The mean % vaccination rate was 28.6% in control (n = 35) and 32.7% in intervention (n = 35) [odds ratio (OR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–0.4, P = .435]. In a sub-analysis, including only homes receiving at least one clinic, control was 28.6% (n = 35) and intervention was 41.7% (n = 23) (OR = 2.08, 95% CI: 0.67–2.70, P = .045).
Interpretation
No effect on vaccination status was demonstrated. Within homes receiving clinics, a significant increase was observed. Process evaluation evidence suggests that starting 3 months into the influenza season partially explains this. Further evaluation initiating FluCare earlier is warranted.