posted on 2018-01-10, 12:37authored byKayleigh L. Warrington, Victoria A. McGowan, Kevin B. Paterson, Sarah J. White
Reductions in stimulus quality may disrupt the reading performance of older adults more
compared to young adults due to sensory declines that begin early in middle age. However,
few studies have investigated adult age differences in the effects of stimulus quality on
reading, and none have examined how this affects lexical processing and eye movement
control. Accordingly, we report two experiments that examine the effects of reduced stimulus
quality on the eye movements of young (18-24 years), middle-aged (41-51 years) and older
(65+ years) adult readers. In Experiment 1, participants read sentences which contained a
high or low frequency critical word and that were presented normally or with contrast
reduced so that words appeared faint. Experiment 2 further investigated the effects of reduced
stimulus quality using a gaze-contingent technique to present upcoming text normally or with
contrast reduced. Typical patterns of age-related reading difficulty (e.g., slower reading, more
regressions) were observed in both experiments. In addition, eye movements were disrupted
more for older than younger adults when all text (Experiment 1) or just upcoming text
(Experiment 2) appeared faint. Moreover, there was an interaction between stimulus quality
and word frequency (Experiment 1), such that readers fixated faint lower frequency words for
disproportionately longer. Crucially, this effect was similar across all age groups. Thus, while
older readers suffer more from reduced stimulus quality, this additional difficulty primarily
affects their visual processing of text. These findings have important implications for
understanding the role of stimulus quality on reading behavior across the lifespan.
Funding
This work was supported by The Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2015-099) and the Economic and
Social Research Council (ES/L010836/1).
History
Citation
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2018
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Biological Sciences/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour