University of Leicester
Browse

Efficacy and Safety of Ravulizumab in IgA NephropathyA Phase 2 Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial

Download (560.16 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-12-03, 16:00 authored by Richard Lafayette, James Tumlin, Roberta Fenoglio, Jessica Kaufeld, Miguel Ángel Pérez Valdivia, Mai-Szu Wu, Shih-Han Susan Huang, Eric Alamartine, Sung Gyun Kim, Min Yee, Andreas Kateifides, Kara Rice, Katherine Garlo, Jonathan Barratt
Key Points This phase 2, double-blind, randomized controlled trial evaluated the complement C5 inhibitor, ravulizumab, in adults with IgA nephropathy.A 30.1% (90% confidence interval, 13.7% to 43.5%) relative reduction in proteinuria for ravulizumab versus placebo was observed at approximately 6 months.Treatment with ravulizumab was well tolerated. Background The complement system plays a central role in the pathogenesis of IgA nephropathy. We present findings from a phase 2 trial of ravulizumab, a complement C5 inhibitor. Methods The Study of Ravulizumab in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis or IgA Nephropathy (NCT04564339) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ravulizumab in addition to standard of care. Adults with IgA nephropathy, proteinuria ≥1 g/d, and eGFR ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and on stable renin-angiotensin blockade were randomized 2:1 to ravulizumab (intravenous every 8 weeks) or placebo for 26 weeks. From week 26–50, all participants received open-label ravulizumab. The primary end point was percentage change in proteinuria from baseline to week 26. Secondary end points included change in proteinuria at week 50 and eGFR. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated. Results Forty-three patients were randomized to ravulizumab and 23 to placebo. At week 26, a statistically significant reduction in proteinuria was observed with ravulizumab versus placebo: −41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], −50.2% to −32.0%) change in urine protein with ravulizumab and −16.8% (95% CI, −31.8% to 1.6%) change with placebo (30.1% treatment effect; P = 0.005). At week 50, there was a −44.8% (95% CI, −55.1% to −32.1%) change from baseline in urine protein with ravulizumab, and in patients who crossed over from placebo to ravulizumab at week 26, the change from baseline (week 0) to week 50 was −45.1% (−58.0% to −28.4%). The least squares mean change in eGFR from baseline to week 26 with ravulizumab was 0.2 (95% CI, −2.3 to 2.7) ml/min per 1.73 m2 and with placebo was −4.5 (−7.9 to −1.1) ml/min per 1.73 m2. From baseline to week 50, the least squares mean change in eGFR with ravulizumab was −3.9 (95% CI, −6.4 to−1.3) ml/min per 1.73 m2, and in patients who crossed over from placebo to ravulizumab at week 26, it was −6.3 (−9.7 to −2.9) ml/min per 1.73 m2. Ravulizumab was well tolerated, with an adverse event profile similar to that for placebo. Conclusions An early, sustained, and clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria and trend toward stabilization of eGFR were observed with ravulizumab versus placebo. A phase 3 trial (NCT06291376) is enrolling. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: Study of Ravulizumab in Proliferative Lupus Nephritis or IgA Nephropathy, NCT04564339.

Funding

This work was supported by Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease.

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Cardiovascular Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

issn

1046-6673

eissn

1533-3450

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2024-12-03

Spatial coverage

United States

Language

en

Deposited by

Professor Jonathan Barratt

Deposit date

2024-11-25

Data Access Statement

Partial restrictions to the data and/or materials apply. Alexion, AstraZeneca Rare Disease will consider requests for disclosure of clinical study participant-level data provided that participant privacy is assured through methods like data deidentification, pseudonymization, or anonymization (as required by applicable law), and if such disclosure was included in the relevant study informed consent form or similar documentation. Qualified academic investigators may request participant-level clinical data and supporting documents (statistical analysis plan and protocol) pertaining to Alexion-sponsored studies. Further details regarding data availability and instructions for requesting information are available in the Alexion Clinical Trials Disclosure and Transparency Policy at https://www.alexionclinicaltrialtransparency.com/data-requests.

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC