posted on 2020-05-20, 11:13authored byMireille B Toledano, Gavin Shaddick, Kees de Hoogh, Daniela Fecht, Anna Freni Sterrantino, James Matthews, Matthew Wright, John Gulliver, Paul Elliott
BACKGROUND:Various mechanisms have been postulated to explain how electric fields emitted by high voltage overhead power lines, and the charged ions they produce, might be associated with possible adult cancer risk, but this has not previously been systematically explored in large scale epidemiological research. METHODS:We investigated risks of adult cancers in relation to modelled air ion density (per cm3) within 600 m (focusing analysis on mouth, lung, respiratory), and calculated electric field within 25 m (focusing analysis on non-melanoma skin), of high voltage overhead power lines in England and Wales, 1974-2008. RESULTS:With adjustment for age, sex, deprivation and rurality, odds ratios (OR) in the highest fifth of net air ion density (0.504-1) compared with the lowest (0-0.1879) ranged from 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.08] for mouth cancers to 1.03 (95% CI 0.97-1.09) for respiratory system cancers, with no trends in risk. The pattern of cancer risk was similar using corona ion estimates from an alternative model proposed by others. For keratinocyte carcinoma, adjusted OR in the highest (1.06-4.11 kV/m) compared with the lowest (<0.70 kV/m) thirds of electric field strength was 1.23 (95% CI 0.65-2.34), with no trend in risk. CONCLUSIONS:Our results do not provide evidence to support hypotheses that air ion density or electric fields in the vicinity of power lines are associated with cancer risk in adults.
Funding
This work was supported by the Department of Health, grant number RRX106. The Energy Networks Association also contributed funding through a grant to the Department of Health. A Steering Committee comprising independent experts and representatives of the funders advised on study design and commented on the protocol. Neither the Department of Health, the Energy Networks Association nor the National Grid were involved in the writing or interpretation of this report which is the responsibility of the authors alone. The UK Small Area Health Statistics Unit is funded by Public Health England (PHE) as part of the Medical Research Council Centre for Environment and Health at Imperial College London (MR/L01341X/1). We acknowledge support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Protection Research Unit (HPRU) on Health Impact of Environmental Hazards (HPRU-2012–10141), and (to P.E.) from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (RDF03).
History
Citation
International Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 49, Issue Supplement_1, April 2020, Pages i57–i66, https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz275