University of Leicester
Browse

Embracing qualitative approaches in gastroenterology research: a call to action

Download (85.78 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-02-13, 16:27 authored by Sam Little, James Tawn, Ghayyur Khalil, Ronit Hardasani, Shellie Radford, Debasish DasDebasish Das, Mohammad Farhad PeerallyMohammad Farhad Peerally

Introduction

In academic medicine, quantitative approaches are often regarded as more robust and reliable. Clearly, many biomedical and clinical research questions are best addressed using research designs such as randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and other approaches embedded within a quantitative paradigm. However, the landscape of medical research is far more nuanced than numbers alone can capture. Issues pertinent to understanding participants’ experiences and perspectives, and how or why certain interventions may or may not work in real-life,1 are better explored qualitatively.2 Despite its value, qualitative research remains underrepresented in Gastroenterology journals.3

Here, we discuss the merits of qualitative research, explore potential reasons for the underrepresentation of qualitative studies in Gastroenterology journals and identify areas where qualitative approaches could yield substantial benefits. We call for a concerted effort to build capacity in qualitative methods within the gastroenterology community and advocate a more inclusive approach to the publication of qualitative articles in Gastroenterology journals.

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Population Health Sciences Medicine

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Frontline Gastroenterology

Publisher

BMJ

issn

2041-4137

eissn

2041-4145

Copyright date

2025

Available date

2025-02-13

Language

en

Deposited by

Dr Mohammad Farhad Peerally

Deposit date

2025-02-12

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC