University of Leicester
Browse

Emergency department workforces’ experiences and perceptions of wellbeing from an international perspective: a scoping review

Download (1.84 MB)
Version 2 2024-10-18, 10:47
Version 1 2024-06-12, 09:58
journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-18, 10:47 authored by Lucy Swancott, Natalie Armstrong, Damian Roland, Helen Walters, kate Kirk

Objectives To identify and present the available evidence regarding workforce well-being in the emergency department.


Design Scoping review.


Setting The emergency department (ED).


Data sources CINAHL, MEDLINE, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched with no publication time parameters. The reference lists of articles selected for full-text review were also screened for additional papers.


Eligibility criteria for study selection All peer-reviewed, empirical papers were included if: (1) participants included staff-based full-time in the ED, (2) ED workforce well-being was a key component of the research, (3) English language was available and (4) the main focus was not burnout or other mental illness-related variables.


Results The search identified 6109 papers and 34 papers were included in the review. Most papers used a quantitative or mixed methods survey design, with very limited evidence using in-depth qualitative methods to explore ED workforce well-being. Interventions accounted for 41% of reviewed studies. Findings highlighted pressing issues with ED workforce well-being, contributed to by a range of interpersonal, organisational and individual challenges (eg, high workloads, lack of support). However, the limited evidence base, tenuous conceptualisations and links to well-being in existing literature mean that the findings were neither consistent nor conclusive.


Conclusions This scoping review highlights the need for more high-quality research to be conducted, particularly using qualitative methods and the development of a working definition of ED workforce well-being.

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open

Volume

14

Pagination

e087485

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

issn

2044-6055

eissn

2044-6055

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2024-10-18

Language

en

Deposited by

Professor Natalie Armstrong

Deposit date

2024-06-10

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC