University of Leicester
Browse

Epigenome-based cancer risk prediction: rationale, opportunities and challenges

Download (824.86 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-04-09, 09:52 authored by M. Widschwendter, A. Jones, I. Evans, D. Reisel, J. Dillner, K. Sundström, E. W. Steyerberg, Y. Vergouwe, O. Wegwarth, F. G. Rebitschek, U. Siebert, G. Sroczynski, I. D. de Beaufort, I. Bolt, D. Cibula, M. Zikan, L. Bjørge, N. Colombo, N. Harbeck, Frank Dudbridge, A-M. Tasse, B. M. Knoppers, Y. Joly, A. E. Teschendorff, N. Pashayan, FORECEE (4C) Consortium
The incidence of cancer is continuing to rise and risk-tailored early diagnostic and/or primary prevention strategies are urgently required. The ideal risk-predictive test should: integrate the effects of both genetic and nongenetic factors and aim to capture these effects using an approach that is both biologically stable and technically reproducible; derive a score from easily accessible biological samples that acts as a surrogate for the organ in question; and enable the effectiveness of risk-reducing measures to be monitored. Substantial evidence has accumulated suggesting that the epigenome and, in particular, DNA methylation-based tests meet all of these requirements. However, the development and implementation of DNA methylation-based risk-prediction tests poses considerable challenges. In particular, the cell type specificity of DNA methylation and the extensive cellular heterogeneity of the easily accessible surrogate cells that might contain information relevant to less accessible tissues necessitates the use of novel methods in order to account for these confounding issues. Furthermore, the engagement of the scientific community with health-care professionals, policymakers and the public is required in order to identify and address the organizational, ethical, legal, social and economic challenges associated with the routine use of epigenetic testing.

History

Citation

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology, 2018, in press

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Health Sciences

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology

Publisher

Nature Publishing Group

issn

1759-4774

eissn

1759-4782

Copyright date

2018

Available date

2018-08-27

Publisher version

https://www.nature.com/articles/nrclinonc.2018.30

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 6 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC