University of Leicester
Browse

Equivocal Rulings on Expert Psychological and Psychiatric Evidence: Turning a muddle into a nonsense

Download (66.28 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2007-07-26, 08:33 authored by R.D. Mackay, Andrew M. Colman
This article expands on a previous critical examination of the rule established in R. v. Turner and discusses more recent decisions regarding the admissibility of expert psychiatric and psychological evidence.

History

Citation

Criminal Law Review, 1996, pp.88-95.

Published in

Criminal Law Review

Publisher

Sweet & Maxwell

Available date

2007-07-26

Notes

This is the author's draft of an article published in Criminal Law Review by Sweet & Maxwell www.sweetandmaxwell.co.uk

Language

en

Administrator link

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    IR content

    Licence

    All Rights Reserved

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC