Establishing a role for the visual complexity of lingustic stimuli in age-related reading difficulty: Evidence from eye movements during Chinese reading
posted on 2020-11-09, 10:37authored byL Li, S Li, F Xie, M Chang, V McGowan, J Wang, K Paterson
Older adults experience greater difficulty compared to young adults during both
alphabetic and non-alphabetic reading. However, while this age-related reading difficulty
may be attributable to visual and cognitive declines in older adulthood, the underlying causes
remain unclear. With the present research, we focused on effects related to the visual
complexity of written language. Chinese is ideally-suited to investigating such effects, as
characters in this logographic writing system can vary substantially in complexity (in terms
of number of strokes, i.e., lines and dashes) while always occupying the same square area of
space, so that this complexity is not confounded with word length. Non-reading studies
suggests older adults have greater difficulty than young adults when recognizing characters
with high compared to low numbers of strokes. The present research used measures of eye
movements to investigate adult age differences in these effects during natural reading. Young
adult (18-28 years) and older adult (65+ years) participants read sentences that included one
of a pair of two-character target words matched for lexical frequency and contextual
predictability but composed of either high-complexity (>9 strokes) or low-complexity (<=7
strokes) characters. Typical patterns of age-related reading difficulty were observed.
However, an effect of visual complexity in reading times for words was greater for the older
than younger adults, due to the older readers experiencing greater difficulty identifying words
containing many rather than few strokes. We interpret these findings in terms of the influence
of subtle deficits in visual abilities on reading capabilties in older adulthood.
History
Citation
Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 81, 2626–2634 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-019-01836-y
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Biological Sciences/Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour
Version
AM (Accepted Manuscript)
Published in
Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics
Volume
81
Pagination
2626-2634
Publisher
Springer (part of Springer Nature), Psychonomic Society