University of Leicester
Browse

Expanded phenotypic spectrum of retinopathies associated with autosomal recessive and dominant mutations in PROM1.

Download (1.76 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-06-18, 10:39 authored by M Del Pozo-Valero, I Martin-Merida, B Jimenez-Rolando, A Arteche, A Avila-Fernandez, F Blanco-Kelly, R Riveiro-Alvarez, C Van Cauwenbergh, E De Baere, C Rivolta, B Garcia-Sandoval, M Corton, C Ayuso
PURPOSE: To describe the genetic and phenotypic characteristics of a cohort of patients with PROM1 variants. DESIGN: Case-case study. METHOD: We screened a cohort of 2216 families with inherited retinal dystrophies using classical molecular techniques and next-generation sequencing approaches. The clinical histories of 25 patients were reviewed to determine age of onset of symptoms, and the results of ophthalmoscopy, best corrected visual acuity, full-field electroretinography, and visual field studies. Fundus autofluorescence and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography were further assessed in 7 patients. RESULTS: PROM1 variants were identified in 32 families. Disease-causing variants were found in 18 autosomal recessive and 4 autosomal dominant families. Monoallelic pathogenic variants or variants of unknown significance were identified in the remaining 10 families. Comprehensive phenotyping of 25 patients from 22 families carrying likely disease-causing variants revealed clinical heterogeneity associated with the PROM1 gene. Most of these patients presented cone-rod dystrophy and some exhibited macular dystrophy or retinitis pigmentosa, while all presented macular damage. Phenotypic association of a dominant splicing variant with late-onset mild maculopathy was established. This variant is one of the 3 likely founder variants identified in our Spanish cohort. CONCLUSIONS: We report the largest cohort of patients with PROM1 variants, describing in detail the phenotype in 25 of them. Interestingly, within the variability of phenotypes due to this gene, macular involvement is a common feature in all patients.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII) from the Spanish Ministry of Health, including CIBERER (06/07/0036), IIS-FJD Biobank PT13/0010/0012, and FIS (PI16/00425); and from the regional government of Madrid, RAREGenomics-CM (CAM, B2017/BMD-3721), all partially supported by FEDER (European Regional Development Fund). In addition, CNAG (2016 BBMRI-LPC Whole Exome Sequencing Call), the Spanish National Organization of the Blind (ONCE), the Spanish Fighting Blindness Foundation (FUNDALUCE), and the Ramon Areces Foundation also supported our work.

History

Citation

American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2019

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/Biological Sciences/Genetics and Genome Biology

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Publisher

Elsevier

eissn

1879-1891

Acceptance date

2019-05-08

Copyright date

2019

Publisher version

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939419302442?via=ihub

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC