University of Leicester
Browse
e001703.full.pdf (564.54 kB)

Experience of point-of-care HbA1c testing in the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme: an observational study

Download (564.54 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-09-09, 08:23 authored by Emma Barron, Shivani Misra, Emma English, W Garry John, Michael Sampson, Max O Bachmann, Julian Barth, Nick Oliver, KGMM Alberti, Chirag Bakhai, Simon O'Neill, Bob Young, Nicholas J Wareham, Kamlesh Khunti, Susan Jebb, Jenifer Smith, Jonathan Valabhji

Introduction To report the observations of point-of-care (POC) glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing in people with non-diabetic hyperglycemia (NDH; HbA1c 42–47 mmol/mol (6.0%–6.4%)), applied in community settings, within the English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP).


Research design and methods A service evaluation assessing prospectively collected national service-level data from the NHS DPP, using data from the first referral received in June 2016–October 2018. Individuals were referred to the NHS DPP with a laboratory-measured HbA1c in the NDH range and had a repeat HbA1c measured at first attendance of the program using one of three POC devices: DCA Vantage, Afinion or A1C Now+. Differences between the referral and POC HbA1c and the SD of the POC HbA1c were calculated. The factors associated with the difference in HbA1c and the association between POC HbA1c result and subsequent attendance of the NHS DPP were also evaluated.


Results Data from 73 703 participants demonstrated a significant mean difference between the referral and POC HbA1c of −2.48 mmol/mol (−0.23%) (t=157, p<0.001) with significant differences in the mean difference between devices (F(2, 73 700)=738, p<0.001). The SD of POC HbA1c was 4.46 mmol/mol (0.41%) with significant differences in SDs between devices (F(2, 73 700)=1542, p<0.001). Participants who were older, from more deprived areas and from Asian, black and mixed ethnic groups were associated with smaller HbA1c differences. Normoglycemic POC HbA1c versus NDH POC HbA1c values were associated with lower subsequent attendance at behavioral interventions (58% vs 67%, p<0.001).


Conclusion POC HbA1c testing in community settings was associated with significantly lower HbA1c values when compared with laboratory-measured referrals. Acknowledging effects of regression to the mean, we found that these differences were also associated with POC method, location, individual patient factors and time between measurements. Compared with POC HbA1c values in the NDH range, normoglycemic POC HbA1c values were associated with lower subsequent intervention attendance.

History

Citation

BMJ Open Diabetes Research and Care 2020;8:e001703. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001703

Author affiliation

Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ open diabetes research & care

Volume

8

Issue

2

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

issn

2052-4897

eissn

2052-4897

Acceptance date

2020-09-21

Copyright date

2020

Available date

2021-09-09

Spatial coverage

England

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC