University of Leicester
Browse
e002017.full.pdf (355.13 kB)

Exploring variation in quality of care and clinical outcomes between neonatal units: a novel use for the UK National Neonatal Audit Programme (NNAP)

Download (355.13 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-01-23, 11:15 authored by Abdul-Qader Tahir Ismail, Elaine M Boyle, Sam Oddie, Thillagavathie Pillay
Neonatology is a relatively new specialty, in which much of the practice remains non-evidence based. Variation in the quality of care delivered is recognised but measuring this is challenging. One possible indicator of this is variation in practice. For more than a decade, the National Neonatal Audit Project (NNAP) has described variation in practice between UK neonatal units in relation to its annually reviewed audit measures. These are based on evidence based national standards or developed by a consensus method and have become de facto measures defining good quality of neonatal healthcare within the UK. In this article we explore the practicality of using the NNAP to look for associations between quality of care and outcomes. This would not be to validate the measures but could help towards a better understanding of the reasons underlying recognised variation in outcomes, even between neonatal units of the same designation.

History

Author affiliation

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ OPEN QUALITY

Volume

11

Issue

4

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP

issn

2399-6641

eissn

2399-6641

Copyright date

2022

Available date

2024-01-23

Spatial coverage

England

Language

English