University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

False periodicities in quasar time-domain surveys

Download (1.53 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2016-11-18, 12:13 authored by S. A. Vaughan, P. Uttley, A. G. Markowitz, D. Huppenkothen, M. J. Middleton, W. N. Alston, J. D. Scargle6, W. M. Farr
There have recently been several reports of apparently periodic variations in the light curves of quasars, e.g. PG 1302−102 by Graham et al. Any quasar showing periodic oscillations in brightness would be a strong candidate to be a close binary supermassive black hole and, in turn, a candidate for gravitational wave studies. However, normal quasars – powered by accretion on to a single, supermassive black hole – usually show stochastic variability over a wide range of time-scales. It is therefore important to carefully assess the methods for identifying periodic candidates from among a population dominated by stochastic variability. Using a Bayesian analysis of the light curve of PG 1302−102, we find that a simple stochastic process is preferred over a sinusoidal variation. We then discuss some of the problems one encounters when searching for rare, strictly periodic signals among a large number of irregularly sampled, stochastic time series, and use simulations of quasar light curves to illustrate these points. From a few thousand simulations of steep spectrum (‘red noise’) stochastic processes, we find many simulations that display few-cycle periodicity like that seen in PG 1302−102. We emphasize the importance of calibrating the false positive rate when the number of targets in a search is very large.

Funding

SV acknowledges support from STFC consolidated grant ST/K001000/1. WNA acknowledges support from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2013-2017) under grant agreement n.312789, StrongGravity. MJM acknowledges support from an STFC Ernest Rutherford fellowship. DH acknowledges support by the Moore–Sloan Data Science Environment at NYU. This research made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System. The CSS survey is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration under Grant No. NNG05GF22G issued through the Science Mission Directorate Near-Earth Objects Observations Program. The CRTS survey is supported by the US National Science Foundation under grants AST-0909182 and AST-1313422

History

Citation

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, (September 21, 2016) 461 (3): 3145-3152.

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/Department of Physics and Astronomy

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP), Royal Astronomical Society

issn

0035-8711

eissn

1365-2966

Acceptance date

2016-06-08

Available date

2016-11-18

Publisher version

http://mnras.oxfordjournals.org/content/461/3/3145

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC