posted on 2011-06-20, 09:33authored byDamian Smedley, Paul Schofield, Chao-Kung Chen, Vassilis Aidinis, Chrysanthi Ainali, Jonathan Bard, Rudi Balling, Ewan Birney, Andrew Blake, Erik Bongcam-Rudloff, Anthony J. Brookes, Gianni Cesareni, Christina Chandras, Janan Eppig, Paul Flicek, Georgios Gkoutos, Simon Greenaway, Michael Gruenberger, Jean-Karim Hériché, Andrew Lyall, Ann-Marie Mallon, Dawn Muddyman, Florian Reisinger, Martin Ringwald, Nadia Rosenthal, Klaus Schughart, Morris A. Swertz, Gudmundur A. Thorisson, Michael Zouberakis, John M. Hancock
The recent explosion of biological data and the concomitant proliferation of distributed databases make it challenging for
biologists and bioinformaticians to discover the best data resources for their needs, and the most efficient way to access
and use them. Despite a rapid acceleration in uptake of syntactic and semantic standards for interoperability, it is still
difficult for users to find which databases support the standards and interfaces that they need. To solve these problems,
several groups are developing registries of databases that capture key metadata describing the biological scope, utility,
accessibility, ease-of-use and existence of web services allowing interoperability between resources. Here, we describe some
of these initiatives including a novel formalism, the Database Description Framework, for describing database operations
and functionality and encouraging good database practise. We expect such approaches will result in improved discovery,
uptake and utilization of data resources.