University of Leicester
Browse
Firm size and learning - FINAL.pdf (178.92 kB)

Firm Size and Skill Formation Processes: an Emerging Debate

Download (178.92 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2012-03-05, 09:41 authored by Daniel Bishop
Recent research has established that small firms tend to develop and acquire the skills they need in different ways to those employed by larger organisations. More specifically, due to certain characteristics inherent to their small size, small firms generally display greater informality in their learning processes. As such, it is now broadly accepted that they cannot normally be expected to learn in the highly formalised and structured ways more often pursued by their larger counterparts. However, this enlightened perspective has, in certain parts of the literature, arguably led to a neglect of formal training as a means of developing skills. Small firms can and do benefit from formal training – some more than others – but this is at risk of being ignored. Based on a critical review of the relevant research, the paper aims to bring a measure of clarity and structure to this emerging debate. In doing so, it draws on the concept of ‘learning architecture’ (Jenlink 1994) to illuminate the connection between firm size and learning processes.

History

Citation

Journal of Education and Work, 2012 (in press)

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE/School of Management

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journal of Education and Work

Publisher

Routledge, an imprint of Taylor & Francis

issn

1363-9080;1469-9435

Copyright date

2012

Available date

2013-08-27

Publisher version

http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13639080.asp

Notes

This is an electronic version of an article published in Journal of Education and Work, 2012 (in press). Journal of Education and Work is available online at: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13639080.asp

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC