University of Leicester
Browse

Five‐Minute Apgar Scores and Its Prognostic Value for Mortality and Severe Morbidity in Very Preterm Infants: A Multinational Cohort Study

Download (654.97 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2025-09-10, 08:15 authored by Harald Ehrhardt, Soodabeh Behboodi, Rolf F Maier, Adrien M Aubert, Ulrika Åden, Elizabeth S Draper, Anna Gudmundsdottir, Veronica Siljehav, Heili Varendi, Tom Weber, Michael Zemlin, Jennifer Zeitlin
<p dir="ltr">ObjectiveTo examine associations between a 5‐min Apgar score < 7 and severe neonatal outcomes in very preterm (VPT) infants and how results are impacted by variations in assigning Apgar scores within an international context.DesignProspective observational population‐based cohort study.SettingEleven structurally and organisationally diverse countries across Europe.PopulationIn total, 7900 liveborn VPT infants from the EPICE‐SHIPS study.MethodsDescriptive statistics, logistic regression, modified Poisson regression.Main Outcome MeasuresAssociations between 5‐min Apgar scores < 7 and adverse neonatal outcomes were estimated with adjustments for perinatal characteristics. We tested for interactions by country‐level prevalence of an Apgar score < 7, grouped into low (14%–16%), medium (19%–22%) and high (28%–40%).Results20.2% of infants had 5‐min Apgar score < 7 with rates of 14%–40% across countries. A score < 7 increased risks of in‐hospital mortality, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), cystic periventricular leukomalacia (cPVL), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and length of hospital stay (LHS), but not necrotising enterocolitis or late‐onset infection (LOI). No interactions with country group were detected for mortality, cPVL and ROP, while associations with IVH, BPD and LHS were restricted to countries with lower prevalence of scores < 7.ConclusionsSignificant differences exist in the prevalence of low Apgar scores across countries. Their interactions with adverse outcomes demand caution when using the Apgar score in prognostic models for clinical care and research without local validation. More broadly, our findings emphasise the importance of accounting for country‐specific effects in clinical assessment scores.</p>

Funding

European Union’s 7th Framework

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Healthcare

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Publisher

Wiley

issn

1470-0328

eissn

1471-0528

Copyright date

2025

Spatial coverage

England

Language

en

Deposited by

Professor Brad Manktelow

Deposit date

2025-08-26

Data Access Statement

Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available as access to datasets of the EPICE and SHIPS cohort is currently not possible for researchers outside the consortium, but the study is part of a H2020 project (RECAP, https://recap-preterm.eu/) to develop a platform for data sharing. The corresponding author is available for more information.

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC