posted on 2025-09-10, 08:15authored byHarald Ehrhardt, Soodabeh Behboodi, Rolf F Maier, Adrien M Aubert, Ulrika Åden, Elizabeth S Draper, Anna Gudmundsdottir, Veronica Siljehav, Heili Varendi, Tom Weber, Michael Zemlin, Jennifer Zeitlin
<p dir="ltr">ObjectiveTo examine associations between a 5‐min Apgar score < 7 and severe neonatal outcomes in very preterm (VPT) infants and how results are impacted by variations in assigning Apgar scores within an international context.DesignProspective observational population‐based cohort study.SettingEleven structurally and organisationally diverse countries across Europe.PopulationIn total, 7900 liveborn VPT infants from the EPICE‐SHIPS study.MethodsDescriptive statistics, logistic regression, modified Poisson regression.Main Outcome MeasuresAssociations between 5‐min Apgar scores < 7 and adverse neonatal outcomes were estimated with adjustments for perinatal characteristics. We tested for interactions by country‐level prevalence of an Apgar score < 7, grouped into low (14%–16%), medium (19%–22%) and high (28%–40%).Results20.2% of infants had 5‐min Apgar score < 7 with rates of 14%–40% across countries. A score < 7 increased risks of in‐hospital mortality, intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), cystic periventricular leukomalacia (cPVL), retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and length of hospital stay (LHS), but not necrotising enterocolitis or late‐onset infection (LOI). No interactions with country group were detected for mortality, cPVL and ROP, while associations with IVH, BPD and LHS were restricted to countries with lower prevalence of scores < 7.ConclusionsSignificant differences exist in the prevalence of low Apgar scores across countries. Their interactions with adverse outcomes demand caution when using the Apgar score in prognostic models for clinical care and research without local validation. More broadly, our findings emphasise the importance of accounting for country‐specific effects in clinical assessment scores.</p>
Funding
European Union’s 7th Framework
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
History
Author affiliation
College of Life Sciences
Healthcare
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Deidentified individual participant data will not be made available as access to datasets of the EPICE and SHIPS cohort is currently not possible for researchers outside the consortium, but the study is part of a H2020 project (RECAP, https://recap-preterm.eu/) to develop a platform for data sharing. The corresponding author is available for more information.