University of Leicester
Browse

Forest biomass retrieval approaches from Earth Observation in different biomes

Download (4.34 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-09-18, 15:53 authored by P Rodriguez Veiga, R Mathieu, S Lohberger, V Avitabile, G Asner, C Schmullius, A Berninger, D Ziolkowski, S Mermoz, J Fransson, Y Rauste, H Balzter, T Le Toan, O Cartus, A Bouvet, K Tansey, A Hoscilo, M Santoro, S Quegan, C Pathe, J Carreiras, M Staengel, K Stereńczak, N Carvalhais, H Persson, M Herold, F Siegert, FM Seifert, C Thiel
The amount and spatial distribution of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) were estimated using a range of regionally developed methods using Earth Observation data for Poland, Sweden and regions in Indonesia (Kalimantan), Mexico (Central Mexico and Yucatan peninsula), and South Africa (Eastern provinces) for the year 2010. These regions are representative of numerous forest biomes and biomass levels globally, from South African woodlands and savannas to the humid tropical forest of Kalimantan. AGB retrieval in each region relied on different sources of reference data, including forest inventory plot data and airborne LiDAR observations, and used a range of retrieval algorithms. This is the widest inter-comparison of regional-to-national AGB maps to date in terms of area, forest types, input datasets, and retrieval methods. The accuracy assessment of all regional maps using independent field data or LiDAR AGB maps resulted in an overall root mean square error (RMSE) ranging from 10 t ha−1 to 55 t ha−1 (37% to 67% relative RMSE), and an overall bias ranging from −1 t ha−1 to +5 t ha−1 at pixel level. The regional maps showed better agreement with field data than previously developed and widely used pan-tropical or northern hemisphere datasets. The comparison of accuracy assessments showed commonalities in error structures despite the variety of methods, input data, and forest biomes. All regional retrievals resulted in overestimation (up to 63 t ha−1) in the lower AGB classes, and underestimation (up to 85 t ha−1) in the higher AGB classes. Parametric model-based algorithms present advantages due to their low demand on in situ data compared to non-parametric algorithms, but there is a need for datasets and retrieval methods that can overcome the biases at both ends of the AGB range. The outcomes of this study should be considered when developing algorithms to estimate forest biomass at continental to global scale level.

Funding

The authors would like to thank the following people and organizations for making the data freely available: JAXA, NASA, USGS, University of Maryland, ESKOM (South Africa), Southern Mapping Company (South Africa), CONAFOR (Mexico), Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH (Indonesia), Martin Thurner, Alessandro Baccini, and Sassan Saatchi. The GlobBiomass project was funded by the European Space Agency under its Data User Element - ITT AO/1-7822/14/I-NB. P. Rodriguez-Veiga, H. Balzter, J. Carreiras, and S. Quegan were supported by the UK’s National Centre for Earth Observation (NCEO). H. Balzter was also supported by the Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award, 2011/R3.

History

Citation

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2019, 77, pp. 53-68

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/School of Geography, Geology and the Environment/GIS and Remote Sensing

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation

Publisher

Elsevier

issn

1569-8432

Acceptance date

2018-12-21

Copyright date

2019

Available date

2019-09-18

Publisher version

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303243418307104?via=ihub

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC