Frailty factors and outcomes in vascular surgery patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

To describe and critique tools used to assess frailty in vascular surgery patients, and investigate its associations with patient factors and outcomes.

Background

Increasing evidence shows negative impacts of frailty on outcomes in surgical patients, but little investigation of its associations with patient factors has been undertaken. Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting frailty in vascular surgery patients (PROSPERO registration: CRD42018116253) searching Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Scopus. Quality of studies was assessed using Newcastle Ottawa scores (NOS) and quality of evidence using GRADE criteria. Associations of frailty with patient factors were investigated by difference in means (MD) or expressed as risk ratios (RR), and associations with outcomes expressed as odds ratios (OR) or hazard ratios (HR). Data were pooled using random effects models. Results

Fifty-three studies were included in the review and only 8 (15%) were both good quality (NOS ≥7) and used a well-validated frailty measure. Eighteen studies (62,976 patients) provided data for the meta-analysis. Frailty was associated with increased age (MD 4.05 years; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.35, 4.75), female sex (RR 1.32; 95%CI 1.14, 1.54), and lower body-mass index (MD -1.81; 95%CI -2.94, -0.68). Frailty was associated with 30-day mortality (adjusted [A]OR 2.77; 95%CI 2.01-3.81), post-operative complications (AOR 2.16; 95%CI 1.55, 3.02) and long-term mortality (HR 1.85; 95%CI 1.31, 2.62). Sarcopenia was not associated with any outcomes.

Conclusion

Frailty, but not sarcopenia, is associated with worse outcomes in vascular surgery patients. Well-validated frailty assessment tools should be preferred clinically, and in future research.