University of Leicester
Browse
e026039.full.pdf (728.33 kB)

Home-based rehabilitation for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: mixed methods process evaluation of the REACH-HF multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Download (728.33 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-05-21, 12:37 authored by Julia Frost, Jennifer Wingham, Nicky Britten, Colin Greaves, Charles Abraham, Fiona C Warren, Kate Jolly, Patrick Joseph Doherty, Jackie Miles, Sally J Singh, Kevin Paul, Rod Taylor, Hasnain Dalal
OBJECTIVE:To identify and explore change processes explaining the effects of the Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) intervention taking account of reach, amount of intervention received, delivery fidelity and patient and caregiver perspectives. DESIGN:Mixed methods process evaluation parallel to a randomised controlled trial using data from the intervention group (REACH-HF plus usual care). SETTING:Four centres in the UK (Birmingham, Cornwall, Gwent and York). PARTICIPANTS:People with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and their caregivers. METHODS:The REACH-HF intervention consisted of a self-help manual for patients with HFrEF and caregivers facilitated over 12 weeks by trained healthcare professionals. The process evaluation used multimodal mixed methods analysis. Data consisted of audio recorded intervention sessions; demographic data; intervention fidelity scores for intervention group participants (107 patients and 53 caregivers); qualitative interviews at 4 and 12 months with a sample of 19 patients and 17 caregivers. OUTCOME MEASURES:Quantitative data: intervention fidelity and number, frequency and duration of intervention sessions received. Qualitative data: experiences and perspectives of intervention participants and caregivers. RESULTS:Intervention session attendance with facilitators was high. Fidelity scores were indicative of adequate quality of REACH-HF intervention delivery, although indicating scope for improvement in several areas. Intervention effectiveness was contingent on matching the intervention implementation to the concerns, beliefs and goals of participants. Behaviour change was sustained when shared meaning was established. Respondents' comorbidities, socio-economic circumstances and existing networks of support also affected changes in health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS:By combining longitudinal mixed methods data, the essential ingredients of complex interventions can be better identified, interrogated and tested. This can maximise the clinical application of research findings and enhance the capacity of multidisciplinary and multisite teams to implement the intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:ISRCTN25032672; Pre-results.

Funding

REACH-HF was funded by a Programme Grant for Applied Research (RP-PG-1210-12004) awarded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Nicky Britten and Charles Abraham are part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula. Kate Jolly is part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC) West Midlands.

History

Citation

BMJ Open 2019;9:e026039

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open

Volume

9

Issue

8

Pagination

e026039

Publisher

BMJ Publishing Group

eissn

2044-6055

Acceptance date

2019-05-15

Copyright date

2019

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC