University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

Hot Topics in Opioid Pharmacology: Mixed and Biased Opioids.

Download (1.16 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-04-17, 13:47 authored by Ammar A. H. Azzam, John McDonald, David G. Lambert
Analgesic design and evaluation has been driven by the desire to create high affinity, high selectivity MOP (mu;µ) agonists. Such ligands are the mainstay of current clinical practice and include morphine and fentanyl. Advances in this sphere have come from designing pharmacokinetic advantage; rapid metabolism for remifentanil. These produce analgesia but also the adverse effect profile that currently defines this drug class; namely ventilatory depression, tolerance and abuse liability. The MOP receptor is part of a family and there are significant functional interactions between other members of the family (DOP;delta;δ, KOP;kappa;κ and NOP;nociceptin/orphanin FQ). Experimentally MOP agonism and DOP antagonism produced antinociception (animals) with no tolerance and low doses of MOP and NOP ligands synergize to antinociceptive advantage. In this latter context lack of effect of NOP agonists on ventilation is an additional advantage. Recent development has been to move towards low selectivity multifunctional ‘mixed ligands’ (e.g., Cebranopadol) or ligand mixtures (e.g., Targinact). Moreover, the observation that β-arrestin coupling underlies the side effect profile for MOP ligands (from knockout animal studies) led to the discovery of biased (to G-protein and away from β-arrestin) MOP ligands (e.g., oliceridine). There is sufficient excitement in the opioid field to suggest that opioid analgesics without significant side effects may be on the horizon and the ‘opioid holy grail’ might be in reach.

Funding

Research on opioids in the laboratory of DGL is funded by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), British Journal of Anaesthesia and British Heart Foundation. AAHA is funded by a scholarship from HCED, Iraq.

History

Citation

British Journal of Anaesthesia, 2019, 122(6), pp. e136-e145

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Cardiovascular Sciences

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Publisher

Elsevier

issn

0007-0912

Acceptance date

2019-03-07

Copyright date

2019

Publisher version

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007091219301874

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC