University of Leicester
Browse

Human Factors Evaluation of Surgeons' Working Positions for Gynecologic Minimal Access Surgery

Download (1.29 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-04-09, 09:25 authored by Sue Hignett, Diane Gyi, Lisa Calkins, Laura Jones, Esther Moss
Study Objective: To investigate work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD) in gynaecological minimal access surgery (MAS), including bariatric (plus size) patients. Design: Mixed methods (Canadian Task Force classification III). Setting: Teaching hospital in the United Kingdom. Measurements: Survey, observations (anthropometry, postural analysis), and interviews. Results: Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSDs) were present in 63% of the survey respondents (n = 67). The pilot study (n = 11) identified contributory factors, including workplace layout, equipment design, and preference of port use (relative to patient size). Statistically significant differences for WRMSD-related posture risks were found within groups (average-size mannequin and plus-size mannequin) but not between patient size groups, suggesting that port preference may be driven by surgeon preference (and experience) rather than by patient size. Conclusion: Some of the challenges identified in this project need new engineering solutions to allow flexibility to support surgeon choice of operating approach (open, laparoscopic or robotic) with a workplace that supports adaptation to the task, the surgeon, and the patient.

History

Citation

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 2017, 24 (7), pp. 1177-1183

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Cancer Research Centre

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Publisher

Elsevier

issn

1553-4650

eissn

1553-4669

Acceptance date

2017-07-15

Available date

2018-07-21

Publisher version

http://www.jmig.org/article/S1553-4650(17)30398-9/abstract

Notes

The file associated with this record is under embargo until 12 months after publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC