University of Leicester
Browse
Hybridisation and Tribuneship.pdf (370.68 kB)

Hybridisation, Personalisation and Tribuneship in the Political Interview

Download (370.68 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-11-25, 10:19 authored by Ian Hutchby
This article presents a comparative analysis of political interviewing in the contemporary environment of broadcast news. Beginning from a conversation analytic perspective, four types of political interview programme are described in terms of their different approaches to questions and answers; opinions and arguments; and neutrality, agency and advocacy. The analysis then turns to the different ways in which 'tribuneship' is manifested in different types of interview, comparing the representation of the public interest as found in both neutralistic and adversarial interviewing with the type of personalised and 'non-neutral' tribuneship found in hybrid political interviews.

History

Citation

Journalism, 2017, 18(1), 101-118

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Sociology

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Journalism

Publisher

SAGE Publications (UK and US)

issn

1464-8849

eissn

1741-3001

Acceptance date

2015-11-04

Copyright date

2017

Available date

2015-11-25

Publisher version

http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1464884916657528

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Keywords

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC