INVESTIGATE-I (INVasive Evaluation before Surgical Treatment of Incontinence Gives Added Therapeutic Effect?): study protocol for a mixed methods study to assess the feasibility of a future randomised controlled trial of the clinical utility of invasive urodynamic testing
posted on 2011-08-03, 10:38authored byMegan Murdoch, Elaine McColl, Denise Howel, Mark Deverill, Brian S. Buckley, Malcolm Lucas, Christopher R. Chapple, Douglas G. Tincello, Natalie Armstrong, Cath Brennand, Jing Shen, Luke Vale, Paul Hilton
BACKGROUND
Urinary incontinence is an important health problem to the individual sufferer and to health services.
Stress and stress predominant mixed urinary incontinence are increasingly managed by surgery due to
advances in surgical techniques. Despite the lack of evidence for its clinical utility, most clinicians
undertake invasive urodynamic testing (IUT) to confirm a functional diagnosis of urodynamic stress
incontinence before offering surgery for this condition. IUT is expensive, embarrassing and
uncomfortable for women and carries a small risk. Recent systematic reviews have confirmed the lack of
high quality evidence of effectiveness.
The aim of this pilot study is to test the feasibility of a future definitive randomised control trial that
would address whether IUT alters treatment decisions and treatment outcome in these women and
would test its clinical and cost effectiveness.
METHODS/DESIGN
This is a mixed methods pragmatic multicentre feasibility pilot study with four components:-
(a) A multicentre, external pilot randomised trial comparing basic clinical assessment with non-invasive
tests and IUT. The outcome measures are rates of recruitment, randomisation and data completion. Data
will be used to estimate sample size necessary for the definitive trial.
(b) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled sub-set of women eligible for the pilot trial will explore
willingness to participate, be randomised and their overall trial experience.
(c) A national survey of clinicians to determine their views of IUT in this context, the main outcome being
their willingness to randomise patients into the definitive trial.
(d) Qualitative interviews of a purposively sampled group of these clinicians will explore whether and how
they use IUT to inform their decisions.
DISCUSSION
The pilot trial will provide evidence of feasibility and acceptability and therefore inform the decision
whether to proceed to the definitive trial. Results will inform the design and conduct of the definitive trial
and ensure its effectiveness in achieving its research aim.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN71327395 assigned 7th
June 2010.