posted on 2018-05-21, 14:14authored byMatt Hopkins, Nikki Shelton
Two National Risk Assessments (NRA) of money laundering have now been published in the United Kingdom (see
HM Treasury 2015 and 2017). While both represent an attempt to identify the risks of money laundering, there
are limitations in relation to the conceptual framework and the methodology used. This paper reviews the UK
NRAs and considers whether revision of the methodology employed could help to both remedy these limitations
and generate more robust findings. Drawing upon the findings of the UK strand of project IARM, it outlines how
a composite money laundering (ML) risk indicator was developed through analysis of threats and vulnerabilities
across 43 police areas. The findings demonstrate that risks are highest in the City of London and the Metropolitan
police area, which is largely explained by the presence of organised crime groups, connections to risky
jurisdictions and the cash intensity of businesses. Although the findings should be treated with caution, it is posited
that this methodology could be used to help future NRAs develop a more robust framework to understand ML risk
and ultimately develop more effective preventative strategies.
History
Citation
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 2018
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Criminology