University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

Impact of Coronary CT Angiography-derived Fractional Flow Reserve on Downstream Management and Clinical Outcomes in Individuals with and without Diabetes

Download (125.31 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-11-28, 13:14 authored by Gaurav S Gulsin, Georgios Tzimas, Kenneth-Royce Holmes, Hidenobu Takagi, Stephanie L Sellers, Philipp Blanke, Lynne MH Koweek, Bjarne L Nørgaard, Jesper Jensen, Mark G Rabbat, Gianluca Pontone, Timothy A Fairbairn, Kavitha M Chinnaiyan, Pamela S Douglas, Whitney Huey, Hitoshi Matsuo, Niels PR Sand, Koen Nieman, Jeroen J Bax, Tetsuya Amano, Tomohiro Kawasaki, Takashi Akasaka, Campbell Rogers, Daniel S Berman, Manesh R Patel, Bernard De Bruyne, Sarah Mullen, Jonathon A Leipsic

Purpose

To compare the clinical use of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR) in individuals with and without diabetes mellitus (DM).

Materials and methods

This secondary analysis included participants (enrolled July 2015 to October 2017) from the prospective, multicenter, international The Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive CT-FFR in Coronary Care (ADVANCE) registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02499679) who were evaluated for suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), with one or more coronary stenosis ≥30% on CCTA images, using CT-FFR. CCTA and CT-FFR findings, treatment strategies at 90 days, and clinical outcomes at 1-year follow-up were compared in participants with and without DM.

Results

The study included 4290 participants (mean age, 66 years ± 10 [SD]; 66% male participants; 22% participants with DM). Participants with DM had more obstructive CAD (one or more coronary stenosis ≥50%; 78.8% vs 70.6%, P < .001), multivessel CAD (three-vessel obstructive CAD; 18.9% vs 11.2%, P < .001), and proportionally more vessels with CT-FFR ≤ 0.8 (74.3% vs 64.6%, P < .001). Treatment reclassification by CT-FFR occurred in two-thirds of participants which was consistent regardless of the presence of DM. There was a similar graded increase in coronary revascularization with declining CT-FFR in both groups. At 1 year, presence of DM was associated with higher rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.2, 4.1; P = .01). However, no between group differences were observed when stratified by stenosis severity (<50% or ≥50%) or CT-FFR positivity.

Conclusion

Both anatomic CCTA findings and CT-FFR demonstrated a more complex pattern of CAD in participants with versus without DM. Rates of treatment reclassification were similar regardless of the presence of DM, and DM was not an adverse prognostic indicator when adjusted for diameter stenosis and CT-FFR.Clinical trial registration no. NCT 02499679Keywords: Fractional Flow Reserve, CT Angiography, Diabetes Mellitus, Coronary Artery Disease Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the commentary by Ghoshhajra in this issue.© RSNA, 2023.

History

Author affiliation

Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging

Volume

5

Issue

5

Pagination

e220276

Publisher

Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)

issn

2638-6135

eissn

2638-6135

Copyright date

2023

Available date

2023-11-28

Spatial coverage

United States

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC