posted on 2019-08-12, 15:28authored byHML Young, S Jeurkar, DR Churchward, M Dungey, DJ Stensel, NC Bishop, SA Greenwood, SJ Singh, AC Smith, JO Burton
Background: Research evidence outlines the benefits of intradialytic exercise (IDE), yet implementation into practice has been slow, ostensibly due to a lack of patient and staff engagement. The aim of this quality improvement project was to improve patient outcomes via the introduction of an IDE programme, evaluate patient uptake and sustainability and enhance the engagement of routine haemodialysis (HD) staff with the delivery of the IDE programme. Methods: We developed and refined an IDE programme, including interventions designed to increase patient and staff engagement that were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), using a series of 'Plan, Do, Study, Act' (PDSA) cycles. The programme was introduced at two UK National Health Service HD units. Process measures included patient uptake, withdrawals, adherence and HD staff involvement. Outcome measures were patient-reported functional capacity, anxiety, depression and symptomology. All measures were collected over 12 months. Results: A total of 95 patients were enrolled in the IDE programme; 64 (75%) were still participating at 3 months, decreasing to 41 (48%) at 12 months. Adherence was high (78%) at 3 months, decreasing to 63% by 12 months. The provision of IDE by HD staff accounted for a mean of 2 (5%) sessions per 3-month time point. Patients displayed significant improvements in functional ability (P = 0.01) and a reduction in depression (P = 0.02) over 12 months, but the effects seen were limited to those who completed the programme. Conclusions: A theory-based IDE programme is feasible and leads to improvement in functional capacity and depression. Sustaining IDE over time is complicated by high levels of patient withdrawal from the programme. Significant change at an organizational level is required to enhance sustainability by increasing HD staff engagement or access to professional exercise support.
Funding
The research was supported by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Leicester Biomedical Research Centre and partly funded by the Stoneygate Trust. H.M.L.Y. and J.O.B. are supported by grants from the NIHR (grant award numbers DRF-2016-09-015 and CS-2013-13-014). S.J.S. is supported by the Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care East Midlands.
History
Citation
Clinical Kidney Journal, 2018, 11 (6), pp. 832-840
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Clinical Kidney Journal
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP) for European Renal Association - European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA)
Online at version of record, https://academic.oup.com/jac/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ckj/sfy050#supplementary-data : Supplementary material 1 - docx file
Supplementary material 2 - docx file