posted on 2015-05-07, 10:24authored byM. J. Taylor, I. Vlaev, John J. Maltby, G. D. A. Brown, A. M. Wood
Objective: Two types of social norm message frame for encouraging seeking of alcoholrelated
health information by excessive drinkers were compared: (a) how much the average
person actually drinks, and (b) how their drinking ranks amongst others. It was hypothesized,
in accordance with recent evidence of how the brain represents value, that frame (b) would be
more effective than frame (a). This is the first test comparing these frames in any domain of
social norms research.
Methods: United Kingdom university students with excessive alcohol intake (n = 101, 66
female) were sent four weekly messages containing one of four types of information
depending upon the experimental condition to which each participant was randomly
allocated: (1) Official alcohol consumption guidelines; (2) how their alcohol consumption
compared to official guidelines; (3) how their consumption compared to the sample mean; or
(4) how their consumption ranked amongst the sample. They then had the opportunity to
request up to 3 types of alcohol-related health information.
Results: Participants informed of how their consumption ranked were more likely to request
information (p < .01, OR = 6.0) and tended to request a greater number of types of
information (p < .01, Wald = 7.17) than those in other conditions.
Conclusions: Informing excessive drinkers of how their alcohol consumption ranked was
more effective in eliciting their seeking of alcohol-related health information than informing
them of how their consumption compared to the mean. Research investigating the
effectiveness of this message frame in social norms interventions more generally is needed.
Funding
This research was supported by ESRC
Grants ES/K00588X/1 and ES/K002201/1, grant RP2012-V-022 from the Leverhulme Trust,
and the CLAHRC for NW London grant number WSSS P28024. This article presents
independent research commissioned by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)
under the Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRC)
programme for North West London.
History
Citation
Health Psychology, 2015, 34 (12), pp. 1200-1203
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Psychology