University of Leicester
Browse
Inclusiveness for TVNM academia.pdf (324.33 kB)

Inclusion as Deliberative Agency: The Selective Representation of Poor Women in Debates and Documentaries about Reproductive Health

Download (324.33 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2015-04-28, 08:57 authored by N. Curato, Jonathan C. Ong
Mass media play a double-edged role in promoting deliberative democracy: they enforce hierarchies in public discussion by prioritizing the voice of particular groups, yet they remain the best, if not the only institution that can temper inequalities in deliberation, particularly in their capacity to grant ordinary people opportunities for voice in deliberative settings. We put forward two criteria that can assess media’s capacity to enforce inclusiveness in public deliberation. A mediated deliberative system is inclusive if it (1) proactively gives visibility and voice to vulnerable groups to be seen and heard on their terms and (2) allows those with less power to act as “deliberative agents” capable of facing their interlocutors, articulating, defending, and considering one’s views. We provide empirical context to this argument through the case of the Reproductive Health debates in the Philippines, as they played out in two different television genres that differently accentuate deliberative agency.

History

Citation

Television and New Media, November 4, 2014 1527476414554401

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCE/Department of Media and Communication

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Television and New Media

Publisher

SAGE Publications

issn

1527-4764

eissn

1552-8316

Available date

2015-04-28

Publisher version

http://tvn.sagepub.com/content/early/2014/10/30/1527476414554401

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC