posted on 2012-10-24, 09:03authored byA. Patel, S. MacMahon, J. Chalmers, B. Neal, L. Billot, R. Joshi, M. Woodward, M. Marre, F. Travert, M. Cooper, P. Glasziou, D. Grobbee, P. Hamet, S. Harrap, S. Heller, L. Liu, G. Mancia, C. E. Mogensen, C. Pan, N. Poulter, A. Rodgers, B. Williams, S. Bompoint, B. E. De Galan
Background
In patients with type 2 diabetes, the effects of intensive glucose control on vascular
outcomes remain uncertain.
Methods
We randomly assigned 11,140 patients with type 2 diabetes to undergo either standard
glucose control or intensive glucose control, defined as the use of gliclazide
(modified release) plus other drugs as required to achieve a glycated hemoglobin
value of 6.5% or less. Primary end points were composites of major macrovascular
events (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal
stroke) and major microvascular events (new or worsening nephropathy or retinopathy),
assessed both jointly and separately.
Results
After a median of 5 years of follow-up, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was
lower in the intensive-control group (6.5%) than in the standard-control group (7.3%).
Intensive control reduced the incidence of combined major macrovascular and microvascular
events (18.1%, vs. 20.0% with standard control; hazard ratio, 0.90; 95%
confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 0.98; P=0.01), as well as that of major microvascular
events (9.4% vs. 10.9%; hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.77 to 0.97; P=0.01), primarily
because of a reduction in the incidence of nephropathy (4.1% vs. 5.2%; hazard ratio,
0.79; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; P=0.006), with no significant effect on retinopathy
(P=0.50). There were no significant effects of the type of glucose control on major
macrovascular events (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.06;
P=0.32), death from cardiovascular causes (hazard ratio with intensive control, 0.88;
95% CI, 0.74 to 1.04; P=0.12), or death from any cause (hazard ratio with intensive
control, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.06; P=0.28). Severe hypoglycemia, although uncommon,
was more common in the intensive-control group (2.7%, vs. 1.5% in the
standard-control group; hazard ratio, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.40; P<0.001).
Conclusions
A strategy of intensive glucose control, involving gliclazide (modified release) and
other drugs as required, that lowered the glycated hemoglobin value to 6.5% yielded
a 10% relative reduction in the combined outcome of major macrovascular and
microvascular events, primarily as a consequence of a 21% relative reduction in
nephropathy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00145925.)
History
Citation
New England Journal of Medicine, 2008, 358 (24), pp. 2560-2572