<p>In this
paper, we discuss the nature of interdisciplinarity and, in particular, the
ways that interdisciplinary working is enacted in TEL Research. Following a
design-based research approach, a common TEL methodological approach, we
identified how interdisciplinarity facilitated the research team to address a
wicked problem, fostered dialogue between researchers in different disciplines
and stakeholders in the research through the lifetime of the project and
facilitated the creation of new meanings. Focusing on the Personal Inquiry Project
(PI) team, interdisciplinary working methods are explored through examining two
boundary objects namely the PI octagon and the concept of scenario, that provide
windows of how interdisciplinary understanding evolves through time and among different
stakeholders. These boundary objects, even though they had different importance
within the project, illustrate the team’s emergent and shared understanding while
maintaining flexibility through a rapid iterative process. We discuss how a
shared understanding was facilitated through active involvement of different
disciplinary teams and consensus was built and refined in the light of emerging
findings. Interviews with researchers on the project and the Advisory Board and
on our own reflections on work practices illustrate key themes, i.e., the
salience of boundary objects in the design process, the
development of a common language, and the importance of a shared vision. We
conclude with a set of requirements for progress in interdisciplinary working and
comment on our view of good practice in fostering interdisciplinarity along
with an outline of what we see as the remaining challenges.</p>
Funding
Thanks to ESRC/EPSRC Technology Enhanced Learning Phase of the Teaching and Learning Research Programme for funding the work of the PI project Personal Inquiry: (PI) Designing for evidence-based inquiry Learning Across Formal and Informal Settings (RES-139-25-038) and the investigation of interdisciplinarity.