University of Leicester
Browse

Interrater agreement in dementia diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Download (1.12 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-10-05, 09:26 authored by Enzo Cerullo, Terry J Quinn, Jenny McCleery, Elpida Vounzoulaki, Nicola J Cooper, Alex J Sutton

Objectives:  Dementia remains a clinical diagnosis with a degree of subjective assessment and potential for interrater disagreement. We described interrater agreement of clinical dementia diagnosis for various diagnostic criteria. 

Methods:  We conducted a PROSPERO-registered (CRD42020168245) systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched multiple cross-disciplinary databases from inception until April 2020 for relevant papers, extracted data and described study quality in duplicate. Study quality was assessed using the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies. We used random-effects models to obtain summary estimates of interrater agreement using kappa and, where possible, Gwet's AC1/2 coefficients. 

Results: We found 7577 titles and 22 eligible studies. Meta-analysis was possible for all-cause dementia using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders third edition revised (DSM-III-R) criteria (kappa = 0.66, 95% CI = [0.53,0.78]), Alzheimer's disease using the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's disease and Related Disorders Association (NINCDS-ADRDA) criteria (kappa = 0.71, 95% CI = [0.65,0.77] for presence/absence and AC2 = 0.61, 95% CI = [0.53,0.70] when distinguishing probable/possible cases), and vascular dementia using the International Classification of Diseases version 10 (ICD-10) criteria kappa = 0.79 (95% CI = [0.70,0.87]). Data was more limited for other criteria and dementia types. AC1/2 coefficients generally indicated higher agreement. One study was rated as high quality. 

Conclusions:  Diagnostic criteria for clinical dementia may have good but imperfect agreement. This has important implications for clinical practice and research studies, which frequently assume these criteria are perfect tests, such as diagnostic test accuracy studies frequently conducted for biomarkers and neuropsychological tests, and for trials where incident dementia is the outcome. 

Funding

EC is funded by a National Institute for Health Research Systematic Review Fellowship (project number RM-SR-2017-09-023). The Complex Reviews Support Unit is funded by the National Institute for Health Research (project number 14/178/29).

History

Citation

Int J GeriatrPsychiatry.2021;36:1127–1147

Author affiliation

Department of Health Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

International journal of geriatric psychiatry

Volume

36

Issue

8

Pagination

1127–1147

Publisher

Wiley

issn

0885-6230

eissn

1099-1166

Acceptance date

2020-12-27

Copyright date

2021

Available date

2023-10-05

Spatial coverage

England

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC