posted on 2016-12-02, 12:53authored byA. Slovick, A. Douiri, R. Muir, A. Guerra, K. Tsiouslos, E. Hay, E. P. S. Lam, J. Kelly, J. L. Peacock, S. Ying, M. H. Shamji, David J. Cousins, S. R. Durham, S. J. Till
Background
Repeated low-dose grass pollen intradermal allergen injection suppresses allergen-induced cutaneous late-phase responses comparably with conventional subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy.
Objective
We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of grass pollen intradermal immunotherapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
Methods
We randomly assigned 93 adults with grass pollen–induced allergic rhinitis to receive 7 preseasonal intradermal allergen injections (containing 7 ng of Phl p 5 major allergen) or a histamine control. The primary end point was daily combined symptom-medication scores during the 2013 pollen season (area under the curve). Analysis was by intention to treat. Skin biopsy specimens were collected after intradermal allergen challenges, and late-phase responses were measured 4 and 7, 10, or 13 months after treatment.
Results
There was no significant difference in the primary end point between treatment arms (active, n = 46; control, n = 47; median difference, 14; 95% CI, −172.5 to 215.1; P = .80). Among secondary end points, nasal symptoms were worse in the intradermal treatment group, as measured based on daily (median difference, 35; 95% CI, 4.0-67.5; P = .03) and visual analog scale (median difference, 53; 95% CI, −11.6 to 125.2; P = .05) scores. In a per-protocol analysis intradermal immunotherapy was further associated with worse asthma symptoms and fewer symptom-free days. Intradermal immunotherapy increased serum Phleum pratense–specific IgE levels (P = .001) compared with those in the control arm. T cells cultured from biopsy specimens of subjects undergoing intradermal immunotherapy had higher expression of the TH2 surface marker CRTH2 (P = .04) and lower expression of the TH1 marker CXCR3 (P = .01), respectively. Late-phase responses remained inhibited 7 months after treatment (P = .03).
Conclusion
Intradermal allergen immunotherapy suppressed skin late-phase responses but was not clinically effective and resulted in worsening of respiratory allergic symptoms.
Funding
Open Access funded by Medical Research Council.This project was awarded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme and is
funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC) and managed by the National
Institute for Health Research (NIHR) on behalf of the MRC-NIHR partnership and
jointly sponsored by King’s College London and Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS
Foundation Trust. The funding source had no involvement in conduct of the research
or preparation of the article. This work was also supported by the NIHR Biomedical
Research Centre at Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College
London and the United Kingdom Clinical Research Collaboration–registered King’s
Clinical Trials Unit at King’s Health Partners, which is partially funded by the NIHR
Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health at South London and Maudsley NHS
Foundation Trust and King’s College London and the NIHR Evaluation, Trials and
Studies Coordinating Centre. S.J.T. was supported a HEFCE Clinical Senior
Lectureship Award. E.P.S.L. was funded by a MRC-Asthma UK funded PhD
studentship. A.S. received funding from Athena SWAN and Royal College of
Surgeons (England). D.J.C. acknowledges support from NIHR Leicester Respiratory
Biomedical Research Unit.
History
Citation
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2016
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND PSYCHOLOGY/School of Medicine/Department of Infection, Immunity and Inflammation
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2016
Publisher
Elsevier for American Academy of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology, Mosby