University of Leicester
Browse

Is atrial fibrillation in HFpEF a distinct phenotype? Insights from multiparametric MRI and circulating biomarkers.

Download (1.79 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-02-20, 14:36 authored by Abhishek Dattani, Emer M Brady, Prathap Kanagala, Svetlana Stoma, Kelly S Parke, Anna-Marie Marsh, Anvesha Singh, Jayanth R Arnold, Alastair J Moss, Lei Zhao, Mary Ellen Cvijic, Matthew Fronheiser, Shuyan Du, Philippe Costet, Peter Schafer, Leon Carayannopoulos, Ching-Pin Chang, David Gordon, Francisco Ramirez-Valle, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Christopher P Nelson, Iain B Squire, Leong L Ng, Gaurav S Gulsin, Gerry P McCann
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) frequently co-exist. There is a limited understanding on whether this coexistence is associated with distinct alterations in myocardial remodelling and mechanics. We aimed to determine if patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent a distinct phenotype.In this secondary analysis of adults with HFpEF (NCT03050593), participants were comprehensively phenotyped with stress cardiac MRI, echocardiography and plasma fibroinflammatory biomarkers, and were followed for the composite endpoint (HF hospitalisation or death) at a median of 8.5 years. Those with AF were compared to sinus rhythm (SR) and unsupervised cluster analysis was performed to explore possible phenotypes.136 subjects were included (SR = 75, AF = 61). The AF group was older (76 ± 8 vs. 70 ± 10 years) with less diabetes (36% vs. 61%) compared to the SR group and had higher left atrial (LA) volumes (61 ± 30 vs. 39 ± 15 mL/m2, p < 0.001), lower LA ejection fraction (EF) (31 ± 15 vs. 51 ± 12%, p < 0.001), worse left ventricular (LV) systolic function (LVEF 63 ± 8 vs. 68 ± 8%, p = 0.002; global longitudinal strain 13.6 ± 2.9 vs. 14.7 ± 2.4%, p = 0.003) but higher LV peak early diastolic strain rates (0.73 ± 0.28 vs. 0.53 ± 0.17 1/s, p < 0.001). The AF group had higher levels of syndecan-1, matrix metalloproteinase-2, proBNP, angiopoietin-2 and pentraxin-3, but lower level of interleukin-8. No difference in clinical outcomes was observed between the groups. Three distinct clusters were identified with the poorest outcomes (Log-rank p = 0.029) in cluster 2 (hypertensive and fibroinflammatory) which had equal representation of SR and AF.Presence of AF in HFpEF is associated with cardiac structural and functional changes together with altered expression of several fibro-inflammatory biomarkers. Distinct phenotypes exist in HFpEF which may have differing clinical outcomes.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Funding

British Heart Foundation through a Clinical Research Training Fellowship (FS/CRTF/20/24069)

National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) United Kingdom through a Research Professorship award (RP-2017-08-ST2–007)

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences/Cardiovascular Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMC cardiovascular disorders

Volume

24

Issue

1

Pagination

94

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

issn

1471-2261

eissn

1471-2261

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2024-02-20

Spatial coverage

England

Language

en

Deposited by

Dr Abhishek Dattani

Deposit date

2024-02-16

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC