University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

Is high recovery more effective than expected recovery in addressing service failure? — A moral judgment perspective

Download (285.15 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2020-04-08, 16:10 authored by Tong Chen, Ke Ma, Xuemei Bian, Chundong Zheng, James Devlin
In the context of two distinctive consumer categories and two different product settings, this research examines the effects of recovery on recovery performance as a function of consumer moral judgment of service failure. The findings of two studies reveal that consumers' response to recovery anchors on the magnitude of recovery but these responses are adjusted according to consumers' moral judgment of service failure. Specifically, consumers react more positively toward expected recovery than high recovery and these effects are pronounced when consumers are low in moral judgment of service failure. In contrast, when consumers are high in moral judgment of service failure, although high recovery (compared with expected recovery) lessens the likelihood of negative word of mouth this effect does not transfer to repurchase tendency. Product involvement does not provide alternative explanations for the findings. The findings of this research have important and meaningful implications for business providers.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 71072154, 71272148)

History

Citation

Journal of Business Research Volume 82, January 2018, Pages 1-9

Published in

Journal of Business Research

Volume

82

Pagination

1 - 9

Publisher

Elsevier BV

issn

0148-2963

Acceptance date

2017-08-23

Copyright date

2017

Available date

2017-10-28

Publisher version

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296317302886

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC