posted on 2007-03-01, 12:17authored byKatherine Brittain, Sarah Perry, Chris Shaw, Ruth J. Matthews, Carol Jagger, John Potter
Objectives: To investigate the prevalence of isolated urinary and fecal, and double incontinence in community living stroke survivors and to assess the degree of soiling.
Design: Community based postal survey.
Setting: 64, 749 community dwelling residents (aged 40+) living in Leicestershire (UK) were randomly selected from the Leicestershire Health Authority register. Residents living in institutional settings were excluded.
Measurements: Respondents were asked about previous stroke, urinary and bowel symptoms, general health and demographic details including age, sex and ethnicity. Urinary incontinence was defined as leakage several times a month or more often. Major fecal incontinence was defined as soiling of underwear, outer clothing, furnishings or bedding several times a month or more often.
Results: A 65% response rate to the postal survey was obtained with the return of 39, 519 eligible questionnaires, with 4% (n=1483) reporting stroke. Five percent of stroke survivors reported major fecal incontinence, with 4.3% reporting both fecal and urinary incontinence and 0.8% reporting isolated fecal incontinence. Major fecal incontinence was four and a half times more prevalent in stroke survivors than the non-stroke population, and stroke survivors were also twice as likely to report soiling of furnishings or bedding. The presence of fecal incontinence in both the stroke and non-stroke population is influenced by functional limitations.
Conclusions
Fecal incontinence is common in stroke survivors and the degree of soiling can be considerable. Future research needs to explore the impact fecal incontinence can have on the lives of stroke survivors and on how it can best be managed in those living in the community.
Funding
Medical Research Council and the National Health Service Research and Development Program on Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke.
History
Citation
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2006, 54 (12), pp. 1915-1919.
Published in
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Publisher
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Available date
2007-03-01
Notes
This is a copy of the author's final draft, not the final published version.