University of Leicester
Browse
18861.pdf (664.93 kB)

Learning to be interprofessional through the use of reflective portfolios?

Download (664.93 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-02-04, 12:29 authored by Sezer Domac, Elizabeth S. Anderson, Roger Smith
Learning portfolios are used extensively in health and social care. There is evidence of their value as a tool to consolidate learning although limited information is available regarding their use in social work education. This study explores the use of a portfolio to encourage social work students to reflect on their interprofessional learning (IPL). The portfolio offers a means of demonstrating professionalism concerning knowledge, skills and attitudes in the context of collaborative practice. The findings of this research suggest that qualifying students were largely capable of reflecting on their development of interprofessional competence after attending specific IPL events, which were part of a wider programme. Social work students found reflective writing difficult, although this improved over time. In particular students struggled to write about skills and attitudes. Students perceived the portfolio to be a good way to assess their progress and believed this helped them to engage with their learning and make meaning through reflection and analysis. They appreciated that IPL and feedback from their assessments had advanced their abilities for self-analysis; despite needing help with reflective writing, they felt better prepared for ongoing use of reflection in their professional development, and in ‘working together’.

History

Citation

Social Work Education, 2016, 35 (5), pp. 530-546 (17)

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF LIFE SCIENCES/School of Medicine/Department of Medical Education (Pre Nov 2017)

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Social Work Education

Publisher

Taylor & Francis (Routledge)

issn

0261-5479

eissn

1470-1227

Copyright date

2016

Available date

2019-02-04

Publisher version

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02615479.2016.1178717

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC