posted on 2019-10-01, 09:46authored byPatrick Laviolette, Sarah Green, Francisco Martínez
This commentary revisits the “Rethinking Euro-anthropology” Forums published in the journal Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale. It reconsiders three specific issues: who are the subjects of European anthropology, who are its others, and who are its authors? Noting that European anthropology does not imply a spatial fixity (there is no “there there” in European anthropology), we suggest instead that European anthropological scholarship is the outcome of diverse forms of crossborder and transborder exchanges. Yet as a project that is both intellectual and political, we further discuss some of the contradictions, ambiguities and paradoxes behind this “worlding” of the discipline. By observing that E(e)uropean anthropology in particular should constantly strive to relate the locating endeavours of ethical practice, empirical evidence, historical reflection and humanistic theorising, we call for innovative forms of academic collaboration, narrative creations and belonging to/with places.
History
Citation
ANUAC. Journal of the Italian society of cultural anthropology, 8(2), 2019. https://doi.org/10.7340/anuac2239-625X-3931
Author affiliation
School of Business
Version
VoR (Version of Record)
Published in
ANUAC. Journal of the Italian society of cultural anthropology
The file associated with this record is under embargo until publication, in accordance with the publisher's self-archiving policy. The full text may be available through the publisher links provided above.