University of Leicester
Browse
- No file added yet -

Low-Dose vs Standard-Dose Alteplase in Acute Lacunar Ischemic Stroke: The ENCHANTED Trial

Download (1.58 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2022-08-30, 09:13 authored by Z. Zhou, C. Delcourt, C. Xia, S. Yoshimura, C. Carcel, T. Torii-Yoshimura, S. You, A. Malavera, X. Chen, M.L. Hackett, M. Woodward, J. Chalmers, J. Xu, T.G. Robinson, M.W. Parsons, A.M. Demchuk, R.I. Lindley, G. Mair, J.M. Wardlaw, C.S. Anderson
OBJECTIVE: To determine any differential efficacy and safety of low- vs standard-dose IV alteplase for lacunar vs nonlacunar acute ischemic stroke (AIS), we performed post hoc analyzes from the Enhanced Control of Hypertension and Thrombolysis Stroke Study (ENCHANTED) alteplase dose arm. METHODS: In a cohort of 3,297 ENCHANTED participants, we identified those with lacunar or nonlacunar AIS with different levels of confidence (definite/according to prespecified definitions based on clinical and adjudicated imaging findings. Logistic regression models were used to determine associations of lacunar AIS with 90-day outcomes (primary, modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 2-6; secondary, other mRS scores, intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH], and early neurologic deterioration or death) and treatment effects of low- vs standard-dose alteplase across lacunar and nonlacunar AIS with adjustment for baseline covariables. RESULTS: Of 2,588 participants with available imaging and clinical data, we classified cases as definite/probable lacunar (n = 490) or nonlacunar AIS (n = 2,098) for primary analyses. Regardless of alteplase dose received, lacunar AIS participants had favorable functional (mRS 2-6, adjusted odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 0.60 [0.47-0.77]) and other clinical or safety outcomes compared to participants with nonlacunar AIS. Low-dose alteplase (versus standard) had no differential effect on functional outcomes (mRS 2-6, 1.04 [0.87-1.24]) but reduced the risk of symptomatic ICH in all included participants. There were no differential treatment effects of low- vs standard-dose alteplase on all outcomes across lacunar and nonlacunar AIS (all pinteraction ≥0.07). CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence from the ENCHANTED trial that low-dose alteplase had any advantages over standard dose for definite/probable lacunar AIS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class II evidence that for patients with lacunar AIS, low-dose alteplase had no additional benefit or safety over standard-dose alteplase. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT01422616.

Funding

This study is supported by grants from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia (project grant numbers 1020462 and 1101113), the Stroke Association of the UK (TSA 2012/01 and 2015/01), the Ministry of Health and the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPQ: 467322/2014-7, 402388/2013-5), the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs of the Republic of Korea (HI14C1985) (for the alteplase-dose arm), and a research grant from Takeda for conduct of the study in China.

History

Citation

Neurology 2021; 96 (11)

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Neurology

Volume

96

Issue

11

Publisher

American Academy of Neurology

issn

0028-3878

eissn

1526-632X

Acceptance date

2020-12-07

Copyright date

2021

Available date

2022-08-30

Spatial coverage

United States

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC