University of Leicester
Browse

Mapping regional implementation of ‘Making Every Contact Count’: mixed-methods evaluation of implementation stage, strategies, barriers and facilitators of implementation

Download (2.37 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-09-30, 11:13 authored by Angela M Rodrigues, Bethany Nichol, Rob Wilson, Caroline Charlton, Beckie Gibson, Tracy Finch, Catherine Haighton, Gregory Maniatopoulos, Emma Giles, Deborah Harrison, Denise Orange, Craig Robson, Jill Harland
BackgroundThe Making Every Contact Count (MECC) programme provides training and materials to support public-facing workers to encourage health-promoting behaviour change by using the day-to-day interactions between organisations and individuals. This project aimed to analyse MECC implementation through a comparative analysis of implementation stage, strategies used for implementation and enablers/barriers of the implementation process within a region in England—the North East and North Cumbria (NENC).MethodsA mixed-methods process evaluation was conducted applying normalisation process theory and theoretical domains framework. MECC programme documents were reviewed and mapped against specific criteria (eg, implementation strategies). An online mapping survey was conducted to establish current implementation/delivery of MECC within NENC settings (eg, local government, healthcare and voluntary community sector). Qualitative research, using individual interviews and group discussions, was conducted to establish further understanding of MECC implementation.ResultsOur findings were informed by reviewing documents (n=5), surveying participants (n=34), interviews (n=18) and group discussions (n=48). Overall, the implementation of MECC within the region was at an early stage, with training mostly delivered between, rather than within, organisations. Qualitative findings highlighted factors that influence stakeholders to implement MECC (eg, organisational goals that were facilitated by MECC implementation, including the prevention agenda), supported resources that facilitate the implementation of MECC (eg, logic models) and enabling factors that promote MECC sustainability across the region (eg, buy-in from leadership and management).ConclusionsThe NENC MECC programme is built around regional leadership that supports the implementation process. This process evaluation identified key influences of MECC implementation across the region. We discuss evidence-based recommendation for policy and practice that can be taken forward to develop targeted strategies to support future MECC implementation. For example, a co-ordinated infrastructure and strategy is needed to combat delivery and implementation issues identified.

History

Author affiliation

College of Business Management

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

BMJ Open

Volume

14

Issue

7

Pagination

e084208

Publisher

BMJ

issn

2044-6055

eissn

2044-6055

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2024-09-30

Spatial coverage

England

Language

en

Deposited by

Mrs Louise Thompson

Deposit date

2024-08-29

Rights Retention Statement

  • No

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC