University of Leicester
Browse

Measuring Quality of Life in Deprescribing Trials: A Scoping Review

journal contribution
posted on 2024-10-11, 15:40 authored by Wade Thompson, Carina Lundby, Adam Bleik, Harman Waring, Jung Ah Hong, Chris Xi, Carmel Hughes, Douglas M Salzwedel, Emily G McDonald, Jennifer Pruskowski, Sion Scott, Anne Spinewine, Jean S Kutner, Trine Graabæk, Shahrzad Elmi, Frank Moriarty

Background

Quality of life (QoL) is an important outcome to capture in clinical trials evaluating deprescribing interventions.

Objective

We aimed to conduct a scoping review to examine how QoL has been measured in deprescribing trials among older people and identify potentially relevant QoL scales, to better inform QoL measurement in future deprescribing trials.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, Epistemonikos, ClinicalTrials.gov, and reference lists of eligible studies (from inception to October 2023). We included randomized and non-randomized comparative studies with a control group that evaluated deprescribing and polypharmacy reduction interventions in people ≥ 65 years of age and measured QoL as an outcome. We also included studies describing the development and validation of QoL scales related to deprescribing, polypharmacy, or medication burden in adults ≥ 18 years of age. Two independent reviewers screened titles and abstracts, then full texts. Two independent reviewers extracted data from 25% of eligible studies in order to verify agreement, then a single reviewer extracted data from the remaining studies, which a second reviewer cross-checked. We critically appraised scales based on the COSMIN checklist.

Results

We retrieved 7290 articles, of which 52 were eligible for inclusion, including 44 deprescribing trials and eight scale development studies. From these studies, we found 21 scales that have been used in the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy (12 generic scales used in clinical trials and nine medication-specific scales). Variations of the generic EQ-5D were the most used scales. The measurement properties of scales for capturing changes in QoL from deprescribing were uncertain. Medication-specific QoL scales have not been employed in deprescribing clinical trials and thus, their performance in this context is also not clear.

Conclusions

Several existing QoL scales have been applied to the context of deprescribing/polypharmacy clinical trials, and new scales specific to the problem have been proposed. If deprescribing does impact QoL, our findings suggest it is uncertain whether existing QoL scales can practically and reliably capture such a change or whether any scale is best. However, this review compares various aspects of the scales that researchers and clinicians can consider in decisions about measuring QoL in deprescribing trials, and in planning future research.

Protocol registration

Open Science Framework: osf.io/aez6w.

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences Healthcare

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Drugs & Aging

Volume

41

Issue

5

Pagination

379 - 397

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

issn

1170-229X

eissn

1179-1969

Copyright date

2024

Available date

2025-05-06

Spatial coverage

New Zealand

Language

en

Deposited by

Dr Sion Scott

Deposit date

2024-09-27

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC