posted on 2019-05-08, 11:34authored bySue Easton, Loretta Lees, Phil Hubbard, Nicholas Tate
Debates concerning residential population displacement in the context of gentrification remain
vociferous, but are hampered by a lack of empirical evidence of the extent of the displacement
occurring. The lack of quantitative evidence on gentrification-induced displacement and the
difficulties in collecting it has long hampered the fight against it. Based on a systematic review
of quantitative studies of the displacement associated with gentrification, this paper considers
how researchers have attempted to measure displacement using a range of statistical and
mapping techniques reflecting the multidimensional character of gentrification. We note that
these techniques often struggle to provide meaningful estimates of the number of individuals
and households displaced by gentrification, something compounded by the lack of data
available on a sufficiently granular temporal and spatial scale. Noting the limitations of extant
methods, we conclude by considering the potential of more novel data sources and emergent
methods involving the processing of larger amounts of (micro)data, as well as participatory GIS
methods that involve affected communities themselves. This implies that whilst the quantitative
study of displacement remains difficult, patterns and processes of displacement can be inferred
through existing data sources, as well as data generated from those who themselves have
experienced displacement.
History
Citation
Urban Studies, 2019
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/School of Geography, Geology and the Environment/Human Geography