posted on 2016-12-01, 10:19authored byQian Gong, Gary Rawnsley
This paper analyses the perceptions of media freedom and responsibility by journalists and
politicians in South Korea during the Presidency of Roh Moo-huyn (2003-8). It draws on indepth
interviews with ten journalists and ten politicians with different political affiliations and
interests. Findings suggest that both groups had positive appraisals of the country’s media
democratisation. For them the media could function as a watchdog on political power without
having to fear direct political reprisals for doing so. However, the political press remained
partially shackled to specific legacies and economic conditions. The most pressing example is
the way the paternal power of conservative media owners challenged the editorial independence
of journalists. While the internet media offered some hope to re-balance the power relationship
between the conservative and progressive forces, the sensational and hyper-adversarial media
motivated by market and political competition emerged as more worrying concerns for the
consolidation of democratic political communication in post-transition South Korea. Setbacks
in press freedom since 2008 have undermined some of the positive evaluations of the political
communication in South Korea, suggesting that the democratic transition in this country
resembles ‘a circle rather a straight line’.
History
Citation
Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, 2017
Author affiliation
/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, ARTS AND HUMANITIES/Department of Media and Communication